Colleague at work told BSV is the solution that scares the crap out of 'the system', not BCH. Care to refute...? I'm in the BTC camp myself, but always curious to 'the other side's arguments'.
Discussion
The last time I looked into BSV their social media site was intriguing, it had "zaps" several years ago. But, they seemed more focused on corporate / business use of blockchain more than functioning as money.
I was in love with BTC as decentralized, p2p money, told everyone about it, learned about lightning, but then the mining fees jumped up and my funds were virtually unusable. It was like dealing with a bank, but it was "bankless" money.
I'm currently having some issues opening a lightning channel as I want to pull out some sats I mined with Ocean. I have made a Bolt12 offer ready, but need to open a small channel to pull out the mined funds, but 100000 sats channels don't seem to be a thing it seems?
Hence my favoritism toward BCH.
21 million max, sha256, etc. It is bitcoin. But, it is 100% usable as P2P electronic cash, all on layer 1. No need for LN, or Cashu, or Liquid, or whatever mumbo jumbo product the Bitcoin community is trying to hoc this week to solve Bitcoin's "scaling problem".
Bitcoin Cash IS Lightning Fast!