Avatar
onthephone
76076b9e2eca3c4f25435780f57b1d5649c7d08b784c20f96c384fa0fec5456f
URL is Monero address ltcmweb1qqt8h4d3h5kvya07k59qe3qc0xgt4q7k88yx6qz68ty5mwzewya3dyqmxs92ur2rq9ugaws5s6ce590jpdf535aktd9x0d2fvk8t9u84jtyw8294p bitcoincash:qzs4rz8d22lzp63hk2fpa8y4wpptkex0z5vz9tt4n0

nostr:nprofile1qqsdftfmdm407yl7pn9vsmfzjszf0x9w9cuh094d5klrr9je9etw9fcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsz9nhwden5te0dehhxarjv4kxjar9wvhx7un89up8r80y , find out where this meme was made, the quality control is horrible.

nostr:nevent1qqsfmcn9q56zkmtxru7jwleh4fydaa4tqre2rkp464nvt5tfym7csqgpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygydvaaf5sfgeumywpf8ydnhrwdfsvujcr0c96cc8kc77n5cw9vrxgpsgqqqqqqszx3lrf

If you bought an American vehicle in the late 90's, very good chance it was Hecho in Mexico.

Your whole notion of quality based on nationality is antiquated. Manufacturing tech is mostly a worldwide commodity today.

Because no one has created a crypto wallet that canl auto-send.

Replying to Avatar β‚Ώen Wehrman

https://blossom.primal.net/8a732fc246b65438427385228f7650443d7228d08bd5cafdfa300dec4fd4b56e.mp4

For YEARS Buzz Aldrin has been telling people to their faces that the moon landing was faked, and people will STILL laugh it off and keep telling themselves it happened.

People cannot bear to admit to themselves that they were lied to on such a grand scale, or that there are powerful manipulators so shameless that they will fabricate a story that big without a second thought.

It's all connected!

Thanks for the meme's! Great research! Now I know the TRUTH!!!!

Better quality? Or just better value because their wages are 25% of an American wage?

The emblem gives her a belly.

Replying to Avatar LiberLion

What is the relationship between hashrate and block distribution?

Current data on #Monero

https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero

Hashrate: This is the computing power contributed by a pool or miner.

The higher a pool's hashrate is relative to the total network hashrate, the greater its probability of finding a block.

Block distribution: This reflects the blocks actually found in a period (e.g., the last 100 blocks).

In theory, it should match the hashrate percentage, but since finding blocks is a probabilistic process, there are short-term fluctuations.

Practical relationship

In the long term: block distribution converges to the relative hashrate of each pool.

In the short term: there may be random deviations. A pool with 20% hashrate may mine 10% or 30% of the blocks in a small sample.

When a pool reaches 50% of blocks over long periods, it also concentrates approximately 50% of the hashrate β†’ risk of centralization.

In summary: the hashrate is the β€œbet” and the distribution of blocks is the observed β€œresult.”

What's the date on these charts

nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qzxrhwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skc34yxrm and the lightning network are a joke. Compared to Monero (and Litecoin & Bitcoin Cash), on a scale of 1-10 the usability of Zeus is a 3 at best.

Unless you're using Muun, it takes a master's degree to set up these LN wallets. It's a fucking joke.

Going into the future, Bitcoin (and any PoW coin) has roughly 6 scenarios that will happen if price stops climbing at a similar rate to the past (I think its a safe bet to say it wont. Name one thing in history that has. Even if it unrealistically swallows 100% value in the world there is still a limit):

1) Unending block rewards (never going to happen 21M is core)

2) Reoccuring blocksize increases + increasing transaction count (Growing fees spread across growing transactions - probably wont happen either, but more probable than #1)

3) Second layers that actually consistently pay miners to secure the chain unlike Lightning (i.e. Drivechains)

4) Nothing changes "scenario A". Thriving fee market. Tiny set of wealthy users are able and willing to pay massive fees. The full potential of Bitcoin is not available to most. Vast majority of plebs will rarely, if ever, touch the base layer. Custodial and less sovereign layers are the norm more than they are even now. No realistic unilateral exit that makes economic sense means the entire security model of layers like lightning are pointless if they can't be enforced on chain.

5) Nothing changes "scenario B". Not enough users are willing to use Bitcoin or pay enough fees for miners to offset dwindling block rewards and secure the blockchain. Miners start dropping out to a new, much lower, equilibrium. (increasingly vulnerable to 51% attack)

6) Mostly altruistic miners (lol. lmao.)

If Bitcoins price doesn't increase at a similar rate to the past, which do you think is most likely? Which do you prefer? What scenario did I miss? You tell me.

#4

"Bitcoin is capital, it's not digital currency"

- Michael Saylor, July 2025

"Bitcoin: A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System"

- Satoshi Nakamoto, 2008

Will the real bitcoin please stand up?

#btc #bch #electroniccash

Bitcoin has been Hijacked!

Or use a bitcoin that is always fast & cheap, and also has a layer 1 stablecoin available for trading. Yup. #bitcoincash works just like #Satoshi described; Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, where "...the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required ..."

There's an all new, 100% trustless, 100% decentralized USD stablecoin in town.

moria.money

Fucking amazing!

Take this article with a grain of salt. Needing fingerprint only is blatant falacy. Reads like a hit piece, too. 6 years ago and no one has reviewd the code yet? Move 9n from this trash.

Same can be said of Signal. FOSS, usable without google. But, I guess if you want a little extra encryption (Signal is already encrypted), I guess Molly would be just fine.