Democracy is just a fancy name for "let's vote it out". It's just a method for individuals in a common endeavor to make decisions without resorting to coercion, or to free-riding.

The problem with democracy is not the method, but the scope of the decisions that we submit to it. When we pretend that anything and all is a valid subject for the democratic method, then what we get is a tyranny of the majority. nostr:note1ljsjxzcmcj0tdvy5jrg3vkumknhxkvk6y6n569nn76el7yum3ytspca4cj

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Very easy to trash democracy but what's the alternative?

I don't see any, as long as we dismantle the State.

Dismantle the state, sure. Great idea in theory but what happens if it all devolves into the law of the jungle?

Rules, not rulers.

Yeah that's all well and good in cyberspace but how about in real life? I'm talking about whack you on the head with a 5 dollar wrench life. 🔧

The real world.

So why don't you go around whacking people with wrenches right now?

I have no need to. However I have been mugged before. My house had been burgled before etc etc.

There are bad people. And there are also good people who do bad things due to circumstances. I'm not naive enough to ignore that.

So you've been mugged and had your house burglarized... despite living in a State? With laws, parliaments, governments, police departments and all? Imagine my shock!

Well it's better than the alternative. And yes the cops did recover some of my property after one incident. Not perfect but at least they did something, it's not like I'm going to go around hunting them down is it?

And how about fires? I suppose we should all just piss them out if we suddenly start? Forest fires? Earthquakes?

Much as I'd love to support the whole idea of Rules Without Rulers it has some limits doesn't it?

What alternative? You said without State people will be knocking each other over the head with wrenches. Then you say in a State, you've been victimized. So what's the difference?

Most common services can be privatized and run by the community. Where I live firefighters are basically volunteers, and traditionally so were the neighbor patrols who policed rural areas.

If you want to hunt someone, after the fact, you can hire a professional bounty hunter or a private detective.

Well without a state it could be worse. I have lived in many countries and believe you me the developed nations are safer. The incidents I refer to happened in South Africa. So thankful I don't live there any more.

That's a function of having less crime because they are richer societies. Not because they have more "state".

Smh.

Finding excuses at any cost.

Smells of nonsense.

Anti Government at any cost. Whereas we know it would all become the law of the jungle.

I can't help you if you can't even see the contradictions in your own comments.

Ahhh reaching.

You jumped at it not realizing there are many states in the world. Some are pathetic and others do a pretty decent job.

Perhaps you would feel at home with the crazies in Afghanistan/Somalia where the law of the jungle applies. Those countries have no actual functioning governments.

Again, you seem stuck with a false correlation between size of the state and crime. Until you get unstuck, you're wasting my time.

Size of the state? Maybe effectiveness?

Law of the jungle would benefit none but the most vicious.

Insightful -- I appreciate these thoughts; yes - it seems by using the tools we have to more effectively communicate and accurately assess our 'collective' will and choice re: priorities for things like fire, police, military, mail, roads, schools, medicine, education, etc --- WE really are in a much better Time and technological/engineering Context --- to cut through a lot of the 'static' or negative influence of 'private interests' on 'public policy' -- WE can obviously use the money we current spend on 'Healthcare' --its the paying off each other thats the problem --HA! -- blockchain makes that shit harder fam --- Let's get it! -- Universal states of 'fair play' --for all --- border less -- FREE -- Together WE are unstoppable.

Right -- this is why the establishment of a border-less and universally distributed and validated -- mutually agreed upon means of exchange, stores of value, unit of account etc -- is an exceptional first step. -- At least when our politicians are being 'bought' --we can SEE it on the blockchain --HA! ---and collectively we learn and grow---instead of 'printing' in hours..what others toiled years of 'life energy' for -- TOGETHER we are unstoppable. --//-- BTC, LTC, ADA

I believe that Cryptocurrency/Blockchain/Publicly-Distributed-Ledger technologies offer a novel chance at the perfect time. -- An opportunity to change our politics and the quality of our governance. -- Empowering the individual, and decoupling from centralized authority, the power to manipulate our monetary policy and supply. -- To engender a greater sense of international unity and accord, with the establishment of universally accepted means of storing, retaining, and exchanging value and keeping units of account. -- WE can unify 'The Millennial Super-Majority'; the 35-and-under demographic which, for the first time, can out-vote 'The Boomers.' --To begin the necessary transition(s) of political, economic, and social power to the coming generation(s). -- Part of the problem is that the 70 and 80 year olds establishing policy, have not, and will not, have to live with the consequences of their decisions; be they 'poisoned waters, burning trees, or unaffordable housing.' -- WE can rally around positive, creative, economically responsible, technologies -- that help remove the influence of money in our politics, and poison from our public discourse. -- To free ourselves from 'Private Interests' in 'Public Halls'; for the betterment of the 'Common Good.' -- I would love to see -- 'The Millennial Super-Majority' – peacefully insist in unity that "WE" are free; and make it so with OUR vote.

-- No more negativity; fix the money; fix the world. -- Let's get it!