I think you’re viewing credit through a fiat lens and assuming it’s for people without money?

In a Bitcoin world, credit isn’t about accessing capital you don’t have. It’s about unlocking liquidity from capital you do have, without selling it. Why would someone borrow against their bitcoin? To access capital without giving up their bitcoin. Unless I’m misunderstanding your point?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But if Bitcoin is money, why would I not want to spend it? Bitcoin is the liquid capital. You don't think Bitcoin would be the most liquid asset in a Bitcoin world? I think you understand my point but I don't understand why you think someone would seek something more liquid than Bitcoin.

I think you are the one seeing viewing credit through a fiat lense. Credit IS meant to access capital you don't have and this will always imply risks and trust.

I don't see the point of this service in a world where Bitcoin is the most liquid asset on Earth and has absolutely no other utility than to be spent because it's money.

i agree

Unexpected but 🤝