Yeah it will make it to a miner but less regularly
Discussion
blocktimes are every ten minutes. Theres no possible way it would have any noticeable effect. I doubt you could delay them for more than a second or two
You are making lots of assumptions
Like that spammers would pay more money to spam in OP_RETURN then the SW for the so called health of the network.
It’s not that knots would prevent all spam but it definitely would slow it down and make it tougher for spammers to propagate throughout the network.
Look these guys already have libre relay and disregard OP_RETURN limits but their transactions don’t get picked up by the network because no one runs Peter Tards spam blaster.
Let’s have a civil conversation about this on nostr:npub1c0rnyyhmdnvg6xkvrrmgf8rxp3r28jtjhad8vmze8rgxf87aed7qlltlvg 💬 we can let nostr:npub1ymt2j3n8tesrlr0yhaheem6yyqmmwrr7actslurw6annls6vnrcslapxnz moderate lol
*cough cough*
I think I’m suddenly coming down with something and conveniently won’t be able to attend
Not true.
"Information wants to be free" - a very old cypherpunk aphorism. Bitcoin's P2P network is gossip, by design - it only needs a few nodes to know about a transaction, and miners are strongly incented to be well connected to find out about txs as early as possible.
A version of bitcoin where it was easy to filter out transactions at the p2p level would be a complete failure in its most important property - censorship resistance.
Bad take. If it’s not a consensus rule it’s a preference. Core removing the ability to set a limit is ludicrous. The OP_RETURN is a feature not bug. nostr:note1sgs3mh7m49v5qj7gg3e3jvf47nhzwn7f59vepce74gs7s2snmfkqm90ml6