Lol, you could have said so from the beginning!
🙌
Discussion
From: pablof7z<-DerekRoss at 06/11/23 11:33:58 on wss://nos.lol
> Lol, you could have said so from the beginning!
>
> 🙌
What fun would that have been? Be well.
CC: #[4]
CC: #[5]
CC: #[6]
CC: #[7]
I’m fine with the early email style responses, I’ve always thought it was a good format, but could you perhaps change the header? Maybe don’t include the relay, time, or CCs since those can more easily be embedded in the event instead of the content?
From: (jsm) at 06/11 11:38
> I’m fine with the early email style responses, I’ve always thought it was a good format, but could you perhaps change the header? Maybe don’t include the relay, time, or CCs since those can more easily be embedded in the event instead of the content?
I've shortened the header significantly. And I've moved the CC:s to the end. For the time being I want to leave the CC:s in place because I don't want to create a horrible UI with checkboxes to select who should be mentioned. I just edit the list and the mentions tagged accordingly.
CC: #[4]
CC: #[5]
CC: #[6]
CC: #[7]
CC: #[8]
Thank you, that looks so much better.
What about changing the more-speech UI to allow editing the list of CCs that goes into the event as text instead of doing that editing in the content? It seems like you’re editing the content so you can edit the tags instead of editing the tags themselves.
> What about changing the more-speech UI to allow editing the list of CCs that goes into the event as text[...]
Editing text with a keyboard and mouse is pretty easy. I am really loath to create a special UI with a bunch of checkboxes for each CC.
In this thread I've been leaving all the headers and CCs in place because the thread was _about_ those headers and CCs. Typically, however, I simply ^A and delete them before I start composing. In this reply, for example, I simply editted out the header and CCs.
That looks much slicker and doesn’t include any repetitive information that clients already show.
What I meant for the CCs is editing the CCs in a separate text field (no annoying and slow checkboxes) as plain text and then using that separate text to change the tags instead of doing the editing in the content field.
From: jsm<-DerekRoss at 06/11 14:08
> What I meant for the CCs is editing the CCs in a separate text field (no annoying and slow checkboxes) as plain text and then using that separate text to change the tags instead of doing the editing in the content field.
Or... Perhaps clients who don't want to show CCs can remove them...
This is what a reply looks like without the headers and CCs. ^A and we're off to the races.
🤙🤙 you too 😊