It’s not GPR. That graphic is inaccurate. They’re using InSAR from multiple angles and using a new, proprietary AI software they developed to create a model from the interference patterns in the near-surface level readings. Still a lot to verify before it “proves” anything, but it at least gives enough evidence to warrant further investigation as they’re the only ones with access to the software.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It looks like thousands of years of compaction and harmonic reflections under a cubic object more than an "underground city"