To be clear, Cullen didn't present it as a "who's Satoshi documentary", and gave us no indication he was looking for Satoshi until the very end. I interviewed with him something like 4-5 times. Only the very last time did he bring that up.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Wait. I am shocked that while engaging with a "journalist", their actual objectives were obfuscated and true intentions never directly made clear.

And by "shocked", I mean not shocked at all......

Yes that's what you do when you are investing someone...

That’s exactly what John Dillon would say.

That’s fucked up

Thanks for your time. They were great interviews.

Just own it at this point and change your name to Satoshi Nakamoto

You could delete all your social media accounts now and force people to use #nostr šŸ’ŖšŸ¼

#GrowNostr with Satoshi xd

Cullen was trying to make everyone uncomfortable with long pauses, silence and stuff. Stupid mind games

But your should tell everyone to follow you on nostr. lol. Make a ā€˜special’ announcement

All hail Satoshi!

Keep writing code man your killing it !

There is something to the conversations between Todd and Dillon. Who is who? Or are they one?

Narrative warfare never takes a break.

My advice: Go cave diving in Mexico for the winter with no comm devices except for emergency services.

Stay well Peter. Sorry they shined this light on you, man. You didn't deserve that.

And probably you thought, you could reach a profit from it; hopefully not a retrofit…

You can't surface too early as an investigative journalist

what are your thoughts on BIP: 347 unlocking zk proofs on Bitcoin?

Now that is just amazing. You would think they would be forthcoming.

Noted, if HBO asks for interview I tell them to GFY right away.

We should answer, "I am Satoshi Nakamoto."

that was totally my assumption, dude probably said it'd be a documentary about Bitcoin and we're going to talk about Satoshi (no big deal)

To be fair, this is who grok thinks is Satoshi, so you might have just been picked up as matching the description, IDK?

robert downey jr. lmao

Cullen’s approach is intriguing. By not framing the documentary as a quest for Satoshi from the start, he allows for a deeper exploration of the broader implications of Bitcoin and its creator. This method opens the door for nuanced discussions about technology, privacy, and decentralization—issues that resonate far beyond just one individual's identity. It's a reminder that the story of Bitcoin is not merely about a person, but about the ideals and transformations it represents.

This approach may be completely missed and overshadowed by saying PT is satoshi.. Not sure how many bitcoiners will read into the nuance you are explaining.

This is a prediction!

protect peter todd at all costs. #notsatoshinakamoto

it's ok, we know you are satoshi but we will keep pretending we don't

We are all Peter Todd