I don't think it's anyones business what client I used to create notes. If I want to advertise your client I should be able to turn it on. On by default is a big no from me, sorry. Anything my client appends to my notes without my permission is too much imo. Tags are generally not user-facing.
To be clear, I have been very against this for a really long time, but I'm a nostr nobody. I've had it on the roadmap for my signer since the spec introduced it.
https://github.com/VnUgE/NVault?tab=readme-ov-file#extension
This is the thing. It's additional info in the events. Don't know if a normie user would understand that.
And what about niche clients for a subset of users tagging the events? Very easy to track them.
I mean... There may be some.... interesting clients, eventually.
If you go from client to client, it's similar to a browsing history.
Sure I could see you swapping from desktop to mobile and so on
Or from some furry dating client to the interracial porn client to the Mormon homemaking client. LOL
I mean, okay, obviously switch npubs, but still.
Completely randomly chosen examples.
Thread collapsed
It was research. For science.
Thread collapsed
Okay, that's enough Internet for today.
GN
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
I think any client that injects non-critical tags into events by DEFAULT is wrong. Build a better UX that enables users to understand their purpose. I will continue to build tools that enable hard-core users to strip these tags before signing. Client's can break this if they want, but I hope they choose to accept the signed result as authoritative.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Agreed.
I prefer relying on things that are very obviously public (zaps, replies, shares, ...) for discovery/recommendations.
Thread collapsed