Not sure when was the last time I heard something about Craig or Calvin. BSV biggest attack was making arguments in the big blocker camp that made later BCH seem like they wanted infinite blocks aswell as making BTC reject Adam Back's 2 - 4 - 8 blocksize increase proposal that would have unified the whole Bitcoin community back then.

Also interesting to note that BCH forked over SegWit because "big blockers" thought of it as an ugly hack that could get exploited also making considerate blocksize increases more difficult if not impossible in the future, because easiness to "spam" vs monetary transactions would increase accordingly.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’ll need to re-read Blocksize Wars. FWIW, I see that the world has settled on BTC, like IPV4. That’s what we got to work with.

Absolutely. There's no point in focusing on BCH anymore. If at all Monero is taking the roll and playing it far better.

But it's necessary and important to re-verify in whom you put your trust.

I find this especially interesting as this sums up Core vs Knots pretty well again.

If for a moment you consider that BTC/BCH split was over SegWit and not formerly over blocksize one needs to question if a compromise of Bitcoin Core dates back far longer than assumed by many.

The Franciscans were debating in the 14th century whether Christ was poor or not. I’ll need to catch up on that debate as well.

Hell yes! (lol)

HFSJ