Then I don’t understand what your comment was referencing. I assumed the context was about needing state control, and you were giving an example of where it was necessary.
Maybe expand on the context of what you mean, because I still can’t come up with anything else.
All I said is that when you have socialists and libertarians,
trying to agree on how to do energy production and regulation,
there's going to be conflict.
the rest was all you.
Well I was just answering what I thought you were addressing in the absence of a direct explanation. I clearly misunderstood, but it’s nothing to get bothered about.
Also you should still check out bootleggers and baptists if you haven’t before. It’s the most important framing for political incentives, imo.
its hard enough to have conversations online
speaking to "oh what you're really saying is"
is not generally useful or productive
lol, dude you gave no explicit context and as you said, its hard to understand what someone means in text sometimes. If you gave no explicit context then my only means is to assume which part of my post you are responding too.
but now you've spent 3 additional comments just complaining about it. Don't know what has you so fixated on this but hope you have a good day anyway. Later
