Likewise, I appreciate your admonition to developers to explain up front that their software isn't free of cost. No one likes paying for something that they've already had for free.

Perhaps the answer is for developers to be very transparent about their finances when it comes to development. How many man-hours are going into the product? How much are server hosting fees? DNS fees?

Lay all the cards on the table, and explain how pricing will be set to make those costs worthwhile. I think many people will accept that gladly.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That would also allow for more competition based upon price.

Why do people in lower-cost countries need to use the stripped-down "free" version of a California or New England app, when they could get a premium Turkish, Thailand, or Nigerian clone for a pittance?

So long as the American and European apps are subsidized, developers in other countries have an uphill battle.

And, no, the answer is not "give them subsidies, too". The answer is more free market.

That is always the correct, long term answer.

Yes. That's what I'd like to see more of in practice. More relationship building, more transparency, and more trust.

I was probably one of the oddball that realized very quickly when using nostr for the first time that it was actually expensive. I asked and was told to not worry about it. So I didn't. But now I see more grumbling and, well, it's just whining, from certain directions. It's barely been 6 months since I started using nostr. In those six months, so much has happened, but not a whole lot has been done in an open discussion on how we the early and few, want to influence and build the nostr of the future in a sustainable, respectful manner. I can't code, but I sure can see some of the roadblocks ahead and wanted to bring my concerns out to have them kicked around by #nostriches at large.