Replying to Avatar GrapheneOS

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqlwsmhk9t2le9see32l006khunnk6qpxxs30enke3d8lykcd6wstq9f4y79 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqexv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9cs8luyws

Blocking cameras works fine. Microphones aren't the only way to record audio and sensors provide high enough quality to decode speech consistently. The way they do that isn't correct. The radio kill switches don't offer a significant advantage over disabling them from an OS. It's not worth a massive security downgrade across the board making compromise far easier.

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqlwsmhk9t2le9see32l006khunnk6qpxxs30enke3d8lykcd6wstq9f4y79 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqexv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9cs8luyws

If Pinephones had good security, they'd be supported devices from GrapheneOS. They're the complete opposite of that though. They're missing most of our official security requirements from https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices and most half decent phones with basic aftermarket OS support. Pinephones are less secure than half-decent mainstream smartphones not just iPhones/Pixels.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

oh ok so this is the reason we cannot have graphenos on pinephones? interesting