Replying to Avatar miljan

Thanks for a reasonable and nuanced take as always Derek. 🫂💜

To answer your question, Primal users can choose whether they want to see NSFW content in their feeds and/or in the trending side bar. The default is that NSFW content shows in the feeds, but not in the trending side bar. This is an easy setting for users to flip.

We are working on a more sophisticated solution where NSFW content will be categorized on a per-note bases (not per-user basis). nostr:npub12z8jsett3k6rv9fa2guau5p540qr2xuvjzkr8e432mglafjt99sqkw9zmx is a perfect example of an account that posts lots of interesting content with a few occasional NSFW notes. Our new system would make it possible for her regular content to trend by default.

A lot of criticism we get can be summarized as "why isn't Primal perfect today?!". We are building and improving things every day. Everything we've done has always been transparent. Happy to engage in good faith, but Semi obviously hasn't been willing to do that. Faking this advisory to generate outrage is obviously over the top. Excusing his behaviour looks a bit weird to me tbh.

Being the author of slidestr.net AND posting some NSFW content on my photography profile, I know this issue from both angles.

Public web clients need some kind of default filter. Using ML seems to be a good approach but we must also accept that this will never be solved perfectly. In a year from now we might discuss what is acceptable or find users try to game these systems. With more video content the classification will also become more complicated and costly.

IMHO filter choices should be part of an onboarding process where a user selects their interests and could also decide on a NSFW filter explicitly. It would be better to mark/blur content than to hide accounts completely without the user knowing. If there ever is a „suggested accounts for #photography“ list, I‘d like to be on it and not be omitted by some default behavior.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.