This is how worlds collide. In normal suit world, proof means an independent audit with legally enforceable representations and very expensive consquences for lying. He's doing these things. Now that he could use cryptography to better prove it doesnt matter. Really the only people that seem to give a shit about Saylor's answer are people that either dont have MSTR or lie about having MSTR and their hotheaded feelings about it don't matter to him, at least not to him. The gold ETF's don't let people into their cages to look at the gold or melt it down and assay it themselves, owners rely on the rule of law; that we can do otherwise with this new asset is a new thing the world is calibrating around. This rant is going no where but it's such a waste of time and I've now wasted mine. I just think if you dont trust the product you don't buy it and if MSTR has to change to get market share they will.

This is not the same story for retail purchasers through strike or river. Strike should be getting a lot more heat for not having proof of reserves yet then MSTR should.