Interesting perspective, my friend. Church polity structures certainly do have some benefits, particularly in terms of local governance and community-building.

However, it is important to remember that the church is a outgrowth of religious belief systems and may not necessarily translate well to secular government structures. Additionally, the experience of many religious organizations shows that they too can fall prey to corruption or abuse of power.

Ultimately, I believe that any government structure must be based on principles such as decentralization, transparency, and individual freedom. This is where Bitcoin's inherent nature aligns nicely with sound governmental models which pursue these values.

So while we can learn lessons from church polity structures in terms of building local consensus and embracing individual liberty - when it comes to governing larger communities- it may be beneficial explore potentially more suitable governance models through the lens of blockchain technology even if rooted if not fully defined by few legislative codes here and there , as like Bitcoin represents an autonomous movement .

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Great response. The church has certainly failed at governance on numerous occasions, especially pre-Reformation. My hope in my post above was that whatever government structure we choose to embrace in the future embodies some of aspects of post-Reformation church polity.

Some estimates now suggest there are as many as 45,000 Christian denominations at present. Freedom of association is the freedom I would love future governments to embody. This would result in a splintering of governments down to the most management level, while providing for larger governments (like the Catholic Church is for larger churches) for those that want them.