Replying to Avatar wymike

“What are you isolating by this?”

Removal of the holder being able to have an influence on the results.

There is not way to scientifically prove that you had no knowledge of what the results would / should be. If this is a real effect that is not caused by any influence of the holder it will still happen in a double blind test. If you really want to know if the effect is real and not caused in any way by you holding the pendulum this is the gold standard of proving it.

“This entire conversation has been a shit show and it’s because you don’t know how to investigate something respectfully.”

I could say the same about you refusing to accept challenges to your methodology.
Avatar
RedTailHawk 1mo ago

I see, so we're back to asshole mode. In other words, I'm a liar. GFY.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
wymike 1mo ago

I haven’t called you a liar or any other name for that fact.

You have called me an asshole multiple times.

I have not personally attacked you and have kept my arguments focused on your methodology. If you can’t make a distinction between the two that is a you problem and not on me.

You have attacked me personally when you didn’t like what I had to say.

I apologised for my bluntness of my initial criticisms and engaged on your terms.

I asked questions as you requested I did but wasn’t satisfied with the answers you were able to provide.

I’m simply trying to point out to you that to scientifically prove the effect you are claiming your methodology requires modification.

If you don’t care about having a defendable protocol then ignore me and carry on but anyone who understands the scientific method is going to accept your results.

Go ahead and call me an asshole again if it makes you feel better.