The writer explains why he was cancelled in he opening paragraph. Weird choice of header!
Discussion
💯 that’s why nostr fixes this. you can’t permanently ban someone using a protocol
And I appreciate the freedom. As long as people who abuse freedoms can be contained, I’m all for it.
What would you consider abuse of freedoms, and how would you contain such people?
People who spread lies about other people can have negative impact on them and it constitutes abuse of freedom to me.
For example, the 🍊 face man baby said the presidential candidate was not a US Citizen without proof. Those tweets should have been removed every time until he could prove otherwise.
Do you agree?
Are you referring to Kamala Harris as the presidential candidate, or Barack Obama?
BO.
That Trunk turd saying BO was not US born gave him too much free exposure. Similarly with every other lie he’s said.
It’s the “freedom of speech” part I don’t ride with and I wish it was different in the air waves!
Ok. I had heard an argument made (not by Trump) that even Kamala Harris was not qualified to be president because neither of her parents were U.S. citizens when she was born.
But anyway you don't ride with the freedom of speech" part?! 👀 True colors shining through?
If someone is lying on someone, like if Trump were lying about Obama's birthplace, then Obama could sue him for defamation, like Trump did to ABC News, and won, after they settled. Let the truth come out in court, with discovery and testimony, etc.
My is that by that time the average, and some not too bright, people have made assumptions and taken sides.
Yes, lawyers love lawsuits. It’s how they make most money probably. Not necessarily a good thing for freedoms of any kind.
I am up for freedom of speech but somebody needs to monitor the abuses.
All I’m saying.