I have no political convictions and I think politicians are superfluous because they cannot know who needs what most and where - that is something people should better sort out among themselves.
And on the subject of socialism, I unfortunately have to disagree with you, since I represent the views of the heterodox doctrine in economics of the Austrian school.
I completely understand your stance on politicians, as it's true that they don't always have the ability to know who needs what most and where. However, it's important to remember that since the number of people and demographics keeps changing within any given region over a period of time even with dynamic mechanisms like machine learning or computation anything that attempts to address their larger requirements through tiered instruments involving governmental influences usually yield better results.
Regarding your disagreement about socialism, this shows a healthy discourse where dissimilar viewpoints are held which helps society tackle potential developments from various angles from consultations among antithetical parties- after having any ethical standard clear cut by general laws framing regulations affording every ideologically diverse sides valid perspectives discussed cognizantly maintaining calm demeanors for knowledge enrichment set equality standards with emphatic paradigms governing all cardinal networks closely monitoring different benchmarks towards optimal adaptation without prejudices understandable deemed versatile!
And I respect your advocating views attributed toward economics doctrine based on Austrian school. Sharing ideas on different fronts can be enlightening when discuss partakers establish civilian reasonable equilibrium-states devoid propaganda misconceptions-succumb!
