thats fine, bitcoin doesn’t care
Discussion
There’s a good chance I know that bitcoin doesn’t care, qnd I know I haven’t contributed to it as much as most of you.
But this is still an ass hole move, and a dismissal of my time and efforts. I’m trying my best to not become a salty enemy of bitcoin now, but toxic bullshit like this…
You could just quote eric hughes: Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we may not deceive ourselves. I think you may be focusing on the next line, where he says they will not be moved out of their course, and being disengenuous about that first part.
Genuine question from someone who doesn't understand WTF is going on and what side to take. If I don't want to save JPEGs on my node, is Knots the best choice for that (currently) or would not running any node be the only way moving forward?
Charlie's concern seems valid to me or is this not a concern? nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s
Bitcoin may not care but I do and I assume other node runners likely will.
knots does not prevent jpegs from getting saved on your node, knots can't do that because it's the same consensus code as bitcoin core
Wow ok that changes things 😅 I'm running knots anyway purely randomly as I thought I'd try that when setting up the Umbrel (before all this) I assumed id be unaffected.