This AI is insanely biased and is only basing its analysis on conversations on X/Twitter. It doesn't take into account the bitcoindev mailing list, delving bitcoin or the bitcoin core meeting logs. I'd caution ingesting this info as absolute truth with regards to the history of OP-Return
Discussion
Hmmm, it's breaking down and helping me iunderstand what the original post I quoted that's posted on here by @p on the topic.
Yeah, however...P's post is an opinion, it's not objective truth. LLMs are always a product of what they are trained on, so it is possible to absorb biases and present them as absolute truth.
I'm not intending to impede you doing your own research, and I actually applaud you for actually doing it!
I simply want to bring up the fact that some of the information I read in the text was either hallucinated or based on incorrect assumptions
So you are saying AI didn't provide accurate interpretation of what P's meant with his post? I asked AI because I don't know much at all on this topic but have been curious to try and get some kind of understanding.
I apologize, I must take a step back myself 😅
I got lost in a thread of your studybitcoin posts that were quote-posting prior study material. So that led me to make one comment generally on the AI text (not specific to the post wrt to analyzing P's original post). For clarity, this method of learning is great, but some of the info is missing context or full information. I understand getting the general gist is normally sufficient, but with bitcoin there are so many nuances that are normally missed (evidenced by Grok, for example, having convos with tenured & technical individuals on X needing to be corrected on certain aspects it responded confidently on)
src: https://x.com/evoskuil/status/1962793264433566006
Feel free to ignore me, as I'm a complete stranger to you. But I appreciate the discourse!
No worries. I totally made a few notes back to back as I kept digging deeper. And I agree that AI is not to be taken for face value but for someone like me whose not in the thick of the tech side of Bitcoin it helps to translate and clarify things well enough. Then next comes in bringing in the community and hearing from real people who have strong takes on it where I again may need AI to help me decipher what they are saying simply because I lack deep historical knowledge or the inner workings of the tech consensus policy stuff like that. :)