Replying to Avatar Geek

Steve Patterson won the debate with nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzdmhxue69uhkzmr8duh82arcduhx7mn9qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcam28zl if the debate was who was the biggest asshole.

He violated every rule he claimed was a problem:

- shreiking

- interrupting

- belittling

Is this really the best the big blockers have to offer?!?

Tbh, it doesn't even matter if you're right that big blocks were what Satoshi wanted.

You lost. Your chain was out competed. And continues to be out competed in a free and open market.

There are few who have earned this more than big blockers: have fun staying poor.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

To all big blockers, I am happy to concede that Satoshi wanted big blocks. It doesn't matter, so I don't care.

Satoshi is not God. He made mistakes. His code - and his vision - was not infallible.

I. Don't. Care.