Surprisingly persuasive
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2
(Thanks to whoever in my follows posted this, I can't find the post now but I appreciate you)
Discussion
Arguing that nukes don’t exist? Or they’re not as powerful as claimed?
The argument is that nuclear bombs can't exist
Ugh.
Attractive thesis other than the fact that we’re living in more of make believe land if that’s true.
For nuclear bombs to exist, nuclei need to exist.
I don't necessarily believe that physics & chemistry have a perfect understanding
But I do believe in nuclear generation of electricity
Should I not?
Same, I also believe you can get tons of energy out of uranium etc...
Just don't believe it's particles dancing around that are doing the trick.
Have you read this? I just heard the claim that nukes don't actually exist for the first time on a podcast the other day. I enjoyed this wide-ranging episode and was tracking with Peter Duke until he went there, and then I thought he had gone into crazy-land (and I think the host thought so, too).
Very interesting, but I would protest that continuity of symbols doesn't prove continuity of command
Also worth a look:
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp22rfmsktmgpk2rtan7zwu00zuzax5maq5dnsu5g3xxvqr2u3pd7qqsrlc335r3kft970xtm837eq5agt9fhd9w08rat3mz5tmvn4kvekuqjh2qsf
yw.