Arguing that nukes don’t exist? Or they’re not as powerful as claimed?
Surprisingly persuasive
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2
(Thanks to whoever in my follows posted this, I can't find the post now but I appreciate you)
Discussion
The argument is that nuclear bombs can't exist
Ugh.
Attractive thesis other than the fact that we’re living in more of make believe land if that’s true.
For nuclear bombs to exist, nuclei need to exist.
I don't necessarily believe that physics & chemistry have a perfect understanding
But I do believe in nuclear generation of electricity
Should I not?
Same, I also believe you can get tons of energy out of uranium etc...
Just don't believe it's particles dancing around that are doing the trick.