Replying to protocolSociety

nostr will be even worse when it gets mainstream adoption, because there is no protection against bots etc., and no; zaps wont help!

Now you might say something like ”you can always point to a relay that filters bot” and to this I will reply: ”Yes, BUT then you get censorship!. You say: ”I can just point to a relay I trust.” Reply: ”Who _can_ you trust?” You: ”My group of selected peers!!!”. Reply: ”OMG! Lets fucking and implement #peercuration” … I mean why not do it NOW?!!!?
Avatar
Hypno Kitty 10mo ago

Agreed, Nostr will eventually be cluttered with noise as well. BUT, at least no one can ever be censored across the board , unlike X, Favebook, Bluesky, TikTok, etc. Nostr guarantees freedom of speech, for humans, bots, and troglodytes alike.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Abstract Equilibrium 10mo ago

This. TwitterX has bots and nostr has bots, but TwitterX only shows you the bot content that profits TwitterX; nostr gives you everything (and hopefully, good tools to manage feeds in that environment)