Did a privacy publication really just leak private DMs?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

its so meta

Not optimal.

😮

Long term reputation loss for a brief moment of viriality

Snowden vibes

No, someone who was conversing with Luke was so incredibly concerned by his desperate line of authoritarian thinking that they decided to blow the whistle to a journalist.

You're really milking this

Yeah, I guess pointing out how easy it is to be mislead is annoying. Sorry I made you feel bad.

Yeah, let’s close our eyes for the authoritarian changes pushed by core despite 1 in every 4 node runners not agreeing

Oh no authoritarian thinking

We all know the messages were fake nostr:nprofile1qqs0w2xeumnsfq6cuuynpaw2vjcfwacdnzwvmp59flnp3mdfez3czpsprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumr0wpczuum0vd5kzmp0ksxxx2

And;

Literally the only explanations for why YOU would support hosting child porn on the blockchain is either because you are pedo.

OR you are just trying to destroy Bitcoin so that some shitcoin like XRP or whatever garbage you support can take its place.

Fuck off.

This putrid shit is not on.

Not really, those could be fake because there's no true verification on Signal outside of in person P2P saftey number confimation.

Yeah, let's just overlook the contents of said messages

Yeah, let us know what you got wrong

Privacy larpers.

TheRageBait™