decentralized ai should not mean decentralized training. it should mean decentralized curation (what to include in the ai)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

CommunismAI?

no. what i mean is some council of intellectuals can say these are better included in a curation and these are just rubbish. much better ai models can be built that will serve the best answers for people's problems. a well curated ai means countering the mainstream narrative optimally.

Anyone can curate and this can be almost free (spam)

But those who decide to train: they spend their resources, they bear responsibility, they get penalized.

So for me it looks like the only viable option for “decentralized curation, centralized training” is communism

How else could this be achieved?

P.S. also it seems to me it has the same vibes as “relays should grant free speech and forget monetization”

wdym?

This is somewhat aligned with cooperative data-collection projects, such as OpenAssistant, Common Voice, OMCS/ConceptNet and others.