AI has contributed the same to the art world that transfer paper contributed to the tattoo world.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s just shortening the distance between idea and its application. It isn’t contributing art, it’s contributing production of imagery.

In other words, it’s closer to a stupid fast photoshop than it is an artist. Art is fundamentally about a human and mortal perspective on value. Something that does not live nor die cannot have actual values. It can only regurgitate them from something else.

NAIL -> HAMMER -> HEAD

Incorrect. Ive never seen transfer paper generate a unique visual all by itself. What’s that you say? “Ai doesn’t generate unique visuals, it just generates visuals based on human art it was trained on.” Guess what? That’s exactly what humans do to. You’re awarding humans with some magical unprovable brilliance that’s becoming increasingly hard to believe in.