This is a lunatic in all genuine uses of the word.
Canadian MP Laurel Collins: "Climate emergencies are not gender neutral. The degradation of ecosystems disproportionately impacts women and girls, and I am wildly emotional. This is the existential crisis of our time."
A wildly emotional woman is an elected representative, pushing climate cultism by law.
These people are going to order “deniers” to be rounded up and put in gulags in support of their ideology. We cannot share a society with people who think like this, it’s is too incoherent and fragmented and they are too dangerous to have power over others. https://v.nostr.build/oM0VL.mp4
Discussion
I can maybe grasp her meaning?
1. You’re using a word, here’s the history
2. There are climate disasters on the horizon
3. When times get bad, women are treated like objects rather than people
4. Let’s use a different word
To be fair, abundant energy and modern technologies are what enabled the cultural revolution which led to modern feminism. If we were to reduce energy consumption to fight ‘climate change’ these technologies would be at risk.
All that aside though, yes, this is a lunatic.