you seem to be attempting to avoid the question by focusing on semantics and making this an ethical debate, so let me rephrase:

would you support someone’s decision to chop off their arm if they told you adamantly that it felt wrong to have it and their life would be better without it?

I am aware of the history, and I have no issue with you calling yourself a women if that makes you happy but that doesn’t mean I have to agree with or support your delusion; my issue lies with the attempt to alter fact and science to fit one’s agenda and as a sovereign individual I have the right to refuse to accept *your* dogma.