It doesn't matter how much Bitcoin they own or how many nodes they spin up ...it's how many miners you have to control the network and they would need more than half a million ...even if they did that we bitcoiners would ignore their fork and carry on with the current chain 😁🚀💯

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

“bitcoiners would ignore their fork and carry on with the current chain”

This is what I mean though. Bitcoiners would continue running nodes that accept only real Bitcoin blocks, and reject blocks built by miners that are “blackrock blocks”.

Point of blocksize wars was that nodes have more control, no?

Miners can be captured by state actors, corporations, whatever, but it’s up to the noderunners to accept the blocks that get mined. That’s my understanding at least, but trying to fill in any gaps 🙏

Yes this makes sense ...blocksize wars is my next book 👍💯

💯

Your last point nails it. It doesn’t even matter how much hash rate they have since miners don’t control the network. Miners produce blocks of transactions. The rest of the network still has to accept, validate, and propagate those blocks, and if miners start producing blocks that are invalid on other bitcoiners’ nodes then they’re wasting real resources mining on a new chain with no proven lasting economic value.

In before Blackrock #bitcoin $BLB is the TRUE bitcoin 😆

🤢😂

😂💯

That’s what I thought! Thank you for the eloquent articulation of it.

Guess we can just add “🖕⚫️🪨” to the “🖕🍎” mantra 😉