I'm being specific and factual because very few people are and I'm sick of it.
The fact of the matter is exactly as I have stated.
If not, send me a link to the codebase and point out where I'm wrong.
Discussion
Holy shit man aren’t you a dev? This is honestly embarrassing I’m not sure what you are trying to accomplish.
Core v30=
CHANGING MEMPOOL POLICY DEFAULT
Knots and discussion =
MASSIVE USER PROTEST AGAINST THE MEMPOOL POLICY CHANGE.
No one is changing consensus or hard forking.
Again none of you people have ever responded to this tweet from core dev Ava Chow in 2023, I’ve posted it 500 times.
Exactly, so why are there so many people who think that Core is pushing a consensus change? Why is half the media saying bitcoin is forking?
👀
Because we are in the middle of a psy-war
The solution is don't trust anybody, especially "bitcoiners"
Realize that bitcoin is designed to be adversarial
Shitcoin-Core should have all their funding pulled.
1. knots users think core v30 changing op_return limit from 80bytes is for “inscriptions and CSAM”
2. hard fork - L0la l33tz published the article with leaked chats from Luke, discussing some new zk proof proposal to censor transactions he doesn’t want.
So basically terms and interpretations all over the shop lol
Who are "my people"? I'm not on either side and have been pretty vocal against Core at times, especially with regard to the way some of them lied about Libbitcoin.
watching bitcoin devs argue about policy defaults feels like debugging open source artwork , everyone’s shouting while i’