32 is already 6 years into the fertility decline and you'll be chasing little kids around in your 40s.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I know women with 4+ kids, who had little ones in their 40s, but they also had teenage kids to help.

Alone, it'd be brutal. Especially if you have really bright kids.

I was 35 when we had our daughter and we want 5 kids. We think that's a reasonable goal. Bare minimum is 3.

Ultimately we'll be happy with what God gives us, but we both wanted a big family.

We did, too. Barely managed two, but they're so active that they each counted double.

Baby math.

We have four and I started when I was 34. Doable 💪😀🤞.

Good. I've quit drinking entirely, now i just need to start a work out regimen.

Moooooar babies!!!!

Agreed!

Yes. That's my point. I said 32 because after that in most women, hanging tits and ass are quite visible and the decline is somewhat obvious.

Of course better late than never they say.

32 actually can look pretty good, if she has children. The pregnancy delays the loss in fertility and that can keep her looking more youthful.

But tired. Mothers always look tired.

Aha. Didn't know that.