In a completely different context that has nothing to do with this one. I already admitted that you're putting forward a dishonest and fallacious argument. You've proven nothing else. Again, it's been real. But peace out.
Discussion
So you are saying it's okay to destroy corporate property in certain context, in a context where the corporation is involved in some nefarious activity.
Now, US corporations are involved in many nefarious/immoral activities and specifically in this instance, in supplying government information on who to "Gestapo-away", or surveiling neighbourhoods with those cars.
People who are targeted by this have every right to destroy such corporation's property, I am sure you agree.
Now that you learned something, maybe go read more about who Winston Churchill really was, so you can avoid the embarrassment stemming from admiring this man...
Peace out.