Interesting case, but this is unrelated to the gene editing itself. The problem is Roundup. This is a problem of capitalist system which does not really care who gets cancer, or in the case of private, for profit healthcare, even incentivizes more cancer - because a looooot of profit can be made curing it.
You would of course, run tests on what you created to see if it's harmful or not
how do you know which genes to replace and with what?
how do you make sure the result does not negativelly affect the ecosystem?
how do you produce huge amounts of the genetically modified seeds?
I bet you can't do all these in your garage.
Having access to some articles and having the means to actually carry out genetic engineering successfully are two different things
In many ways genetic engineering is superior technology and perhaps crucial for mankind to survive as the environment changes and the crops need to be adapted so we have food.
The problem, as always, is WHO OWNS this technology. For WHOSE BENEFIT and HOW is it used?
Both change genes, so they are hardly "completely different"
Yemeni fighters to the Arab regimes. "Open the borders for us to march to Palestine .. [or] we will open them by force." https://nostr.download/80bb4b6ca28891088d9de2b28a5d3590a0526224c50dfd204f778677ca9c731e.mp4
Absolute badasses
https://x.com/arnemx/status/1931721420343492959?s=46
This is what I found after a minute of searching. I saw other things say she was calling for illegal immigrants in the United States to “mobilize”
This is an act of war.
Thanks but we need the whole clip to know what she means.
Notwithstanding, it definitely is not an act of war, but looking at your other engagements here, you seem to be seeing existential threats everywhere.
If anything, it's not the immigrants making your life worse - it's your government.
So you are saying it's okay to destroy corporate property in certain context, in a context where the corporation is involved in some nefarious activity.
Now, US corporations are involved in many nefarious/immoral activities and specifically in this instance, in supplying government information on who to "Gestapo-away", or surveiling neighbourhoods with those cars.
People who are targeted by this have every right to destroy such corporation's property, I am sure you agree.
Now that you learned something, maybe go read more about who Winston Churchill really was, so you can avoid the embarrassment stemming from admiring this man...
Peace out.
You wanted a discussion but then you run away?
So you are saying destroying corporate property is okay in certain context right?
It's a corporate property right? How is that false equivalence Winston?
Fine. Were you against the destruction of arms factories of the 3rd Reich?
Oh boy, I guess you really are a simp. Or just not very well educated...
Your property rights are safe and nobody is threatening those.
We are talking about corporate property.
Fundamentally untrue. Just take China for example. Very regulated yet advancing year after year...
Well no it will not be more efficient than burning. That money, propping up your arms industry, is paying wages in the US. It also butchers people abroad, but that's okay because *checks notes* it's for their freedom.
Could that money be spent better? Of course. It could pay for healthcare, education, housing, transition to clean energy...
why do you two always share such "derp derp level" racist content? Have you been both cucked by blacks or what is the reason?
My boy, most of the money for Ukraine was given to US weapons manufacturers. Your money is in their villas...


