Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar HODL

Theory: I have this theory of probabilistic influence where i think it might be possible to turn up the temperature on a person algorithmically.

In the old days intelligence agencies had to have direct contact with a would be shooter if they were going to groom someone for an assassination, today I believe it’s possible via algorithms, targeting, online groups etc… to do all of that remotely with no direct engagement.

The new thing isn’t digital grooming. That’s been happening.

It’s more like an algorithmic volume knob where you can increase the probability that something happens to someone.

We already know that modern algorithmic environments can increase baseline risk factors in a population the speculative leap I’m making is something like… you can take someone from >1% risk of assassination to 20% risk of assassination and your hands are never anywhere near the murder weapon so to speak.

I have no proof this theory is real. I have no proof that power has shifted from direct coercion to probability shaping, this is just something I think might be happening.

Avatar
Piotr 3w ago

You're right about that and it doesn't have to be assassination, in can be for eg suicide. When you're stalked you get suicidal thoughts and much more. Very bad thing to do to other person? What do you think should happen to people doing such things? Should it be viewed as direct attempt to harm or not?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.