Theory: I have this theory of probabilistic influence where i think it might be possible to turn up the temperature on a person algorithmically.

In the old days intelligence agencies had to have direct contact with a would be shooter if they were going to groom someone for an assassination, today I believe it’s possible via algorithms, targeting, online groups etc… to do all of that remotely with no direct engagement.

The new thing isn’t digital grooming. That’s been happening.

It’s more like an algorithmic volume knob where you can increase the probability that something happens to someone.

We already know that modern algorithmic environments can increase baseline risk factors in a population the speculative leap I’m making is something like… you can take someone from >1% risk of assassination to 20% risk of assassination and your hands are never anywhere near the murder weapon so to speak.

I have no proof this theory is real. I have no proof that power has shifted from direct coercion to probability shaping, this is just something I think might be happening.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It will be very likely with ai.

Interesting. I always think back that if the whole world could be psy-opped into planking, harlem shaking, and manican challenging.. with old tech. The ability to do much more now is more than likely

Blue Light + Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm

Explains my Twitter feed. Fuckers have turned it to 11 on me.

We used to fear coercion. Now we should fear environments that quietly decide what is ā€œlikely.ā€

Yes. This is why the ā€œnaziā€ rhetoric has 10x since Trump’s first term by the algos and mainstream. The useful idiots just parroted. It was so someone like Kirk could be murdered on live television and 50% of the country would just shrug their shoulders.

It's been proven Facebook has run an experiment previously to see if they could make someone depressed by showing only certain content on their feed, and it worked. The FBI for sure has run their own experiments. If they could accomplish this just through algorithms, it makes it a lot cleaner for them. They don't need to cover anything up or kill anyone. Your assigned FBI agent is moving this idea up the ladder as we speak!

Basically this

Robert Epstein conversation with Joe Organ covers this a bit

Rogan*

The web vibrations move the spider

Watch the final episode of season 1 of Rabbit/Hole.

Better yet watch the whole first season.

This is similar to the theory I’ve had about school shootings. It was never in the collective imagination until the internet. I’m 62 and we had menacing situations and intense fights as kids in the 70s, but nobody thought of gunning down kids and teachers. Then with Columbine and others it became part of the consciousness and was algorithmically enhanced over time. There are many other factors, of course, but…

Using fear as a tool is nothing new. It's been used since forever. Using digital tools to spread fear trough messaging is nothing new ether. Countries spreading lies, misinformation and half truths is what what is happening for some time now.

So, your hypothesis (not theory....theory is when you have proof) sure could be true.

X is culpable.

Absolutely!

Certainly hard to directly prove; but if it walks, talks, and looks like a duck…well it’s probably a duck…

(or at least propagandized to make one believe it is) 🤪

Even knowing what I know about these algos work (X etc) - it still shocks me how much power they can have over you. A few glances at the ā€œFor Youā€ feed can nuke your mood for a good chunk of the day

Reckon you might be on to something

If you jumble up the words omicron & delta.. They spell "media control". They always tell you what they're doing...

Not a chance the some three letter agency has not been experimenting with this.

I doubt it. It would mean intelligence agencies have direct access to algos on popular platforms. I don’t see that happening.

But astroturfing has been going on for as long as it’s been possible to do it.

It’s naive to think they haven’t infiltrated social media companies in one way or another

I feel like the twitter files showed us pretty clearly that American intelligence agencies do have direct access inside popular platforms. I would imagine there’s direct foreign infiltration as well. There’s a mini red scare going on in Silicon Valley right now about Chinese spies surrounding A.I. companies like open A.I. seems obvious that would happen on social platforms also.

The twitter files showed the gov trying to go in the front door. But the reality is, they were also going in the back door at the same time. No way they weren’t when they’ve done this exact thing in media for literally decades

Yep

Yup. Precrime engineering. Assume true. Obvious extension of known operating protocols.

Did they though? They had influence over who stays and who gets silenced but not over direct algo (as far as I remember)

The new TikTok deal might have direct algo manipulation.

If it is true i feel like ag & pharmaceutical industry has been a catalyst to it in the past decades

Would make for a great thriller book.

Your theory is real. It is an almost perfect description of how demonic spiritual warfare operates. The unseen, immaterial (spiritual) world probabilistically influences the material world by ā€œturning up the temperatureā€ on people with only non-physical mechanisms. (Our IAs are fully demonic. )

You have no proof and you never will, thats the whole point of an op like that.

I think one of the reasons why Candace has been putting up such crazy numbers is that she has actually found some clues that could illuminate some aspects of the deep state.

So far no one really knows who the modern deep state is exactly or how they operate specifically... We just have some vague ideas or whatever.

I think she's on to some small piece of their game and the people who want to know the truth are intrigued.

That, or they have her right where they want her and she's far off the scent šŸ˜‚

Hey, a clue!

There’s a reason why a certain country in the Middle East wants control of the algorithms šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

Could they increase your odds of selling your bitcoin too?

I mean most real bitcoiners are out of the matrix.

This is fun. I agree with the ā€œtheoryā€. patten recognition followed by reinforcement. Send it lol

šŸŽÆšŸ’Æ

If it works for selling garbage to the masses.. obviously this isn’t a leap.

Hell, if I mention apple pie around the house for a few days an apple pie will appear.

🄧

Very likely that this is happening. What would an evil person be incentivised to do ? Exactly that. Least risk, least effort for maximum damage.

Evil exist so yes it's happening

By the way, this happened to Charlie Kirk and Trump. The only question I have is: Is this centrally planned or is it generated decentrally by the woke mind virus ?

This XRP ETF thing still surprises me.

Hitting $1B AUM faster than ETH? Institutions clearly know something we don’t šŸ˜‚

And now people keep mentioning these FLR rewards too.

I'm still storing more XRP in my wallet and more this year — how do I even check if I’m eligible?

I checked mine a few days ago and saw a small allocation there.

It wasn't huge, but definitely worth knowing about.

If you were holding XRP and have an active wallet, you might have something waiting too.

So if I held XRP earlier this year, I might have FLR?

I haven’t touched that wallet in months

You might. It depends on the exact snapshot date though and how much in XRP you have.

Some people are seeing a little, some more, it really depends on what you held back then.

But it’s worth checking so you don’t miss anything simple.

Okay I’m definitely opening that wallet today before I miss something šŸ˜‚

Yes, just visit their official blockchain network and check from there. If you’re confused, just send me DM or https://wa.me/+12542717188, I’ll help you through

Brad recently mentioned RLUSD — Ripple's stablecoin, and how it fits into the border ecosystem.

The integration is impressive.

They’re clearly building something long-term and structured.

A friend told me he found about 600k FLR randomly in his wallet and I thought he was joking šŸ˜‚

This whole cycle is really surprising.

Exactly. With the ETF milestone, the FLR distribution and RLUSD, the ecosystem is getting renewed attention.

Utility coins are finally taking the spotlight again.

Agree.

Elon has created a lot of wealth with products he sells to government.

I think he is the pathway to privatize existing DARPA technology. Peter Theil is the same. Bill Gates is the same. Etc...

His job is to normalize the technology, how it is to be used, and who owns the IP.

Imagine more groups have that kind of probabilistic brainwashing weapon. And one group turns the knob to "assasinate the guy", while another turns the knob to "protect the guy, he's a hero". I feel like you are on to something here... it would explain a lot i.e. all the polarity when you talk to people.

Tictok being bought. Like leaving a loaded gun at a riot.

Yea or even the using the data of one’s internet history to find people who are intelligent capable and willing to carry out such acts. Then just slip in to their life and guide/direct them to the act. A mixture of both is definitely so posible. Thanks FIAT!

AI - mimics life but has no soul (connection with source - God). It is a mirror of ourselves, but like a reflection, it may look like us but it has no breath.

We are being fooled, cajoled by the spectacle.

This is the time to clear our karmic entanglements and create a pathway - bandwidth to the Source.

Use the machine don't let it use you.

Yea, you could totally do that. Encircle a persons feed, just like the eclipse attack on a nod (surround them with malicious nodes) and feed his brain misinfo.

You're right about that and it doesn't have to be assassination, in can be for eg suicide. When you're stalked you get suicidal thoughts and much more. Very bad thing to do to other person? What do you think should happen to people doing such things? Should it be viewed as direct attempt to harm or not?

It makes perfect sense. Without naming names. Certain media personalities are oracles - determining how their guests are portrayed. More importantly, their audience can be given tailored content to reinforce their polarisation and thereby weaponise some of these individuals. It takes an almost spiritual level of self-awareness to understand how this happens and not act upon this misdirection.

There are certain influencers that at a drop of a hat, could be demonised and thereby taken out by an individual not directly controlled.

Additionally, we have all seen some very bad examples of LLM telling people to do bad things, like the algorithm went rogue.

I mean, your theory would be a natural extension of Nudging, so there is some scientific credence to your theory I think, especially if AI is used.

That's not theory.

2012. Facebook experimented with this.

They worked with Cornell University. The manipulated user feeds by altering the amounts of positive and negative feeds. The goal was to test nudging methods. Or "emotional contagion."

Working in media, getting to know who moves those markets... it's all designed to be.

I remember in 2014, NetFlix gave a panel on this. How to nudge users to do certain things on the platform. They cited Facebook-Cornell's research.

Scary stuff.

But it's real. And happening.

Absolutely real. It's called radicalisation / brainwashing.

You might want to check out the book "Who owns the future" by Jaron Lanier. He details what you describe but focusing on social manipulation in general. A really good read.

Supports the idea that Charlie Kirk was killed by a radicalized college kid and also a nation state.