I have been told my whole life that this sentence is so evil that the sentence itself has even been replaced by the euphemism "the 14 words":

"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

Saying this sentence in public or saying you believe in this sentence is such a social stigma you may still be cancled over today over it.

Does this sentence seem evil to you?

With BTC's exchange rate ending 2025 down 6%, the 4 year cycle of 3 up years followed by 1 down year is officially broken.

On the bright side, Bitcoin has never seen 2 down years in a row. Let's just hope that pattern isn't broken in 2026!

Google collects a completely insane amount of data on you, but in theory there's a way to delete it.

This article from 2022 explains how to manage and delete Google's data on you, at which point you can cancel your Google account and hope they really do respect your requests and deleted all your data.

www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/google-collects-a-scary-amount-of-your-data-but-theres-a-way-to-delete-it/

#DeleteYourDataFromGoogle

Realized today that one of the reasons Pluribus is a fascinating mystery is the same reason Luke Dashjr is a fascinating character.

You see, neither the Pluribus nor Luke are capable of lying. Or at least, that's what they claim...

But when you delve deeper, you realize that they both perpetrate an incredible amount of deception, and they do so via what any normal person would call a "lie of omission."

As such, Pluribus is a captivating mystery show because you're constantly trying to figure out how the hive mind is being deceptive while still answering all of the questions from the protagonists honestly.

Just watched Blade Runner 2049. Pretty good 👍

Theory: I have this theory of probabilistic influence where i think it might be possible to turn up the temperature on a person algorithmically.

In the old days intelligence agencies had to have direct contact with a would be shooter if they were going to groom someone for an assassination, today I believe it’s possible via algorithms, targeting, online groups etc… to do all of that remotely with no direct engagement.

The new thing isn’t digital grooming. That’s been happening.

It’s more like an algorithmic volume knob where you can increase the probability that something happens to someone.

We already know that modern algorithmic environments can increase baseline risk factors in a population the speculative leap I’m making is something like… you can take someone from >1% risk of assassination to 20% risk of assassination and your hands are never anywhere near the murder weapon so to speak.

I have no proof this theory is real. I have no proof that power has shifted from direct coercion to probability shaping, this is just something I think might be happening.

Just bought a personal EKG device for no reason other than it happened to cost the exact amount I had remaining in my FSA for 2025.

A few months ago I rented a Ferrari on Turo but ended up getting a Corvette because the convertible top was broken by a previous renter.

Today I rented a BMW i8 but ended up getting a Corvette because the previous renter smoked weed in the i8.

I'm sensing a pattern.

Also it's ridiculous that I couldn't simply accept the stinky i8. I told them I had already driven a Corvette and wanted something different 😑

You’re triggered by this why?

Stop supporting globalist companies