Nothing. You cannot centrally plan a response to diseases. The entire premise is a fraud. Let individuals choose how they handle it, and that’s it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Let them all swamp the ER and die. Great idea

You cannot stop diseases with centrally planning. That’s it. You completely missed the point. Not even going to relive the β€œswamp the ER” hysterics. We knew the virus wasn’t deadly to anyone not sick or elderly immediately. Even if it were, back to point 1, you cannot centrally plan a response to diseases.

To the contrary, you CAN centrally plan a response to a disease, in the same way you can centrally plan market prices. And the results are about the same

Haha. You’re right. I should have caveated it with, β€œand have a good outcome”.

That’s what they did specifically because they tried to have one stupid global plan for everyone.

Are you suggesting that huge, centralized decision making and risk consolidation is BETTER than decentralized experimentation and risk assessment?

If you actually believe something so contrary to common sense and everything we know about markets and networks then I would ask why on earth you are in #Bitcoin?

It's very ambiguous moment. Even if you dsa - at the current moment - the prices are not very - storing of value - if you need to exchange the btc for monthly expenses. But, from a high sight - even people that are not not BTC could realize how bad is the financial world.