I'm with you on thinking about this.
I don't want to be paranoid but I do wonder if using neobanks within the European Union is safe, from the risk of government overreach perspective. Governments in EU can collaborate on tracking us down.
Perhaps Dukascopy from Switzerland is a better choice. But even there, I would not be sure.
Tough issue. How to drive Bitcoin adoption, which means use it to buy stuff, and yet avoid tax implications, ideally legally.
I guess the best thing works be to live in a jurisdiction where there is no capital gain tax on selling Bitcoin, but this leaves is with Switzerland, hard to immigrate to, or El Salvador, far away, maybe Madeira as well. Any other options people see?
Otherwise, we have to hide behind peer to peer exchanges, coin joins or alike, which all comes with the cost, hassle and risk. Even peer to peer, like Bisq or Robosats, they anyway leave a trace in your bank account history. Sure, it looks like a regular transfer to some individual, but still, if they trace the Bitcoin seller, they will know. And peer to peer cash, impractical.
Interestingly, in the sovereign individual book, the authors predicted Bitcoin, but also predicted a growth of e-commerce and an economy that is outside of the governments ability to tax, which, I think, has not really materialized. Thanks to technology and regulations, is seems to me, governments can easily track our transactions, unless we try to hide, which, like I said, come with cost, risks and hassle.
I'm unsure what to do myself. Today, beyond stacking sats for the future, that is, the digital gold or treasury reserve asset use case, I'm not selling, I'm not using Bitcoin to buy anything, because, from a tax perspective, it is like selling.
Complicated. I'd love to hear perspectives from others.