Looking back, the counterweight to AI risk will look obvious. It’s Bitcoin. That’s the part most people still miss.

AI agent hackers are the natural result of computing getting cheaper and cheaper. Eventually, you get systems that can outthink and break any defense built only on rules, permissions, or conditional logic. If humans wrote it, AI will learn how to exploit it.

Bitcoin solves a different problem.

It’s the world’s chosen proof of work system. And that matters because you can’t stop advanced AI using logic alone. You need something AI can’t shortcut. Physical cost.

AI’s real weakness is computation cost. And Bitcoin turns real world energy and hardware cost into a scarce, tradable digital resource. That cost can be used as collateral, friction, and defense. Not permission. Not rules. Cost.

Bitcoin makes brute force expensive again.

Once you see this, you see why Bitcoin isn’t just money or “digital gold.” It’s a base layer that future computing systems can rely on to protect themselves from AI driven attacks.

Digital gold doesn’t even come close to explaining why Bitcoin matters in 2030 and beyond.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Humans wrote Bitcoin; does that not challenge your entire argument? That AI would learn how to exploit it, especially being the highly deterministic and mathematically predictable system its become. Bitcoin is not computational cost problem, it's an economic optimization problem. Many blockchains have already failed because we simply refuse to use them. What makes Bitcoin any different?

Of course, humans wrote bitcoin protocol.

If AI can capture the 51% of energy input then it might exploit it. Energy has physical cost to it.