They were kicked out by the Romans, so why not settle it with the descendents of those people? This argument gets nonsensical really fast when you start thinking about the implications

Jewish people peacefully lived in Palestine for centuries, this could have continued, legally acquiring private property from the palestinian - but no. Land is not private property in Israel. And zionism is inherently anti-semitic because it was designed to remove jews from Europe

Socially backwards is an opinion, not a right to invade

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'm assuming you mean settle it with the middle easterns. the descendents of the people that now live there would rather erradicate them, like they've done in every single occasion they have.

Culturally different Not a right to invade, ofc. Just stating why Miles likes them

Erradicate them, that is simply false. You're only looking at what happened after the1930s. Any population would want to erradicate an invader.

Jews and Christians lived in Palestine for a long time including under Ottoman rule.

You are not wrong. The majority of the pushbacks came from after the creation of Israel. A lot of the prosecution from before that, that led them to flee came from Christians and Byzantines.

Now (and aknowledging that it wasn't the Muslims fault that they had to leave) what would you do to with the current situation?

Stop messing with Palestinians building permits and bulldozing their houses. Remove all fucking walls, fences and checkpoints, and instead redirect all resources to intelligence and justice to prosecute any further aggression to any person jew or muslim

Immediately dissolve the Israel Land Authority, property titles assigned to leasees, allow Palestinians to buy back their land (even if it was stolen)

In summary: stop aggression and allow free markets