In the nostr:npub12262qa4uhw7u8gdwlgmntqtv7aye8vdcmvszkqwgs0zchel6mz7s6cgrkj vs Primal / nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr debate:

1. It is reasonable for relays to censor on behalf of their users. The important points are that the policies should be clear, and users should be given as much control as you can technically give them.

2. It is reasonable for someone to play-attack a system to make the point that the system has flaws, as long as they don't persist in doing so.

I don't think nostr:npub12262qa4uhw7u8gdwlgmntqtv7aye8vdcmvszkqwgs0zchel6mz7s6cgrkj shoud have gone as far as he did with the bot.

I don't think nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr / Primal should have a blocked-from-trending list. If something is trending, who are they to think they know better whether their users want to see it - clearly users are trending it - porn or not.