This guy always cracks me up.

He is for sure the biggest goof out of all the actronauts, and that's not easy to achieve.

https://m.primal.net/PTUj.mp4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So the scientific records & calculations used to achieve possibly the greatest human exploration endeavour of all time were destroyed? And, assuming this was filmed in the late 90’s or so, the processing power of Intel chips, information exchange capabilities of the internet & storage capabilities far beyond tapes, can’t replace slide rules, telephones and calculations by hand.

Since AI is a computing Goliath now, and SpaceX is launching rockets like popcorn, another mission to the moon must surely be taking place this year or next?

I don’t know, maybe I’m just slow.

It's obviously all fake, NASA and SpaceX just steal taxpayer money and shoot rockets into the Bermuda triangle.

No one has ever been on the Moon and the easiest way to prove this is the communication delay.

As far as I can remember, mathematically it would take like 11-12 seconds delay just for the communication to reach Earth from the Moon and at times, the astronauts were responding with 2 seconds delay - which is impossible.

Robot Polisher on YT has done a lot of short clips exposing NASA and they're quite fun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKSyNpWaVQU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baS7GE2eYxw

How can they go to the Moon if they still haven't determined whether Space is gay or straight:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5a7QjY4XKA

And Austin Witsit (the creator of auditnasa.com) does longer form podcasts exposing the absolute fraud that NASA is.

https://rumble.com/v4fb590-nasa-fraud.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

https://rumble.com/v4hb91r-nasa-fraud-episode-2.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

https://rumble.com/v4uzf62-nasa-fraud-episode-3.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

The moon landings seem very questionable. But as far as launching satellites into orbit, what about Starlink / GPS networks?

Clearly people are using Starlink in remote places to access the internet wirelessly. I also used wifi on a plane lately - plus the GPS system works very well for surveying, navigation etc.

Satellites work in harmony with ground-based towers and undersea cables, but they might not be what you expect.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RMTTeWVlTk

NASA is also the biggest buyer of helium.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Plu2gfUGuQ

That would mean many balloons launched world wide and coming down somewhere. After decades of this, wouldn’t some see these coming down? They can’t all land in the ocean.

The guy who lays the undersea cables in the first video says 95% of all telephone and data is transferred over submarine cables.

My uneducated guess is that it's probably closer to 99%.

I don't remember where I saw this - but I remember seeing that the vast majority of satellite-balloons are launched in Antarctica.

There's this thing called the The Antarctic Treaty signed by over 50 nations, forbidding anyone to freely explore Antarctica.

To understand how this would work though, you would have to use the Flat Earth map and not the spinning ball with water stuck to it, with the people in Australia being upside down.

Two well-made documentaries are:

https://rumble.com/v4ofj20-what-on-earth-happend-13-part-full-doc-aewaranon-lhfe.html

https://rumble.com/v2djm9c-the-lost-history-of-flat-earth-full-series.html

Thanks.

There is intrigue around Antarctica, I have run across that treaty in past travels. The Germans were exploring it during ww2, and then US shortly after. The visits by ‘high level officials’ recently is puzzling, what’s so interesting about it compared with the North arctic area?

The Antarctic wall is the edge of our known world on a flat Earth map, which is also the UN logo.

The last man to explore Antarctica before the Antarctic treaty was admiral E. Byrd who said it was an untouched reservoir of natural resources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJJbc81OJcU

But to answer your question more directly, what do all these 50 countries who signed the treaty have in common?

They want to control and enslave their populations.

As a slave master if you had the ability to give your people free and endless energy, would you do it - obviously you're not incentivized to - you'd want your people to have the least free time possible, so they can't figure out how badly you're fucking them up the ass.

You need a nation of workers, not a nation of thinkers.

If food, water, energy and land is practically free and abundant, you're gonna have a tough time as a dictator.

Bitcoin broke this enslavement system, but most people don't know this yet.

Interesting, my concept of a spherical Earth is being tested.

You’re right regarding rulers mot wanting critical thinkers. Just people being able to think enough to serve their master’s needs and desires.

Free energy, no way. Maybe one would burn down Tesla’s lab which held all of this work on free energy for the world and those power transmitting towers. I mean if energy can be beamed around in the form of cell signals, why not on a larger scale?

A ruler might also add fluoride to the drinking water, to reduce cognitive capabilities in the masses. Maybe even get them hooked on TV and other memorizing electronic devices.

Damn, I’m using one right now lol.

*Mesmorizing devices.

Well if you still believe the Earth is a spinning ball, you have some research to do.

You can either believe your eyes and your senses or you can believe in scientism priests.

Nothing will make sense until you start asking questions.

Until then, the Earth seems like it's flat, but it's actually a ball.

It seems like it's stationary, but it's actually spinning with thousands of miles per hour.

It seems like you can't get water to stick to a ball, but you actually can.

The people in Australia seem perfectly normal, but they're actually upside down.

It's just gravity and meanwhile gravity doesn't work on helium balloons somehow.

Doing this kind of research is a personal choice of course, for some people it's much better to just stick with the official narrative - life is simpler that way.

I worked as a broadcast engineer for decades. When we calculate the amount of power and antenna height needed to send a signal of a certain strength to a certain location, the curvature of the Earth has to be taken into account. If the Earth were flat, then the signal dropoff with distance would perfectly follow the inverse square law (which states that field strength diminishes by 6 dB every time you double the distance from the antenna). But it doesn't follow the inverse square law. If it did, you could pick up FM stations from New York City in Lisbon with perfect clarity. When the curvature of the Earth, based on its sphericity, is included in the equations, then field strength predictions are accurate.

Thank you very much for this clarity and validation. It’s been a while since I took physics, but I understand the inverse square law (used in light calcs as well). This makes perfect sense.

I’m also reminded of the math in GPS calculations, and triangulation. Which also proves curvature of the earth by taking into account satellite positions relative to the receiver on the ground. This includes geometric dilution of precision, if I’m not mistaken.

Not hating, just curious… Why would the earth be flat? Did god create it that way? Or did it naturally occur? Is there any evidence of other flat planets/worlds? As per your diagram, why can’t Australia see the sun during the night? How does gravity work?

What you say about communications delays between the Moon and Earth is incorrect. Light (and radio waves) travel at around 186,000 miles per second, and the Moon is about 240,000 miles from the Earth. Therefore the delay would be approximately 1.3 seconds.

Yes, I misremembered, but the point stands.

It's 1270ms * 2 = 2540 ms for communications round trip.

236,752miles / 186,282miles/s = 1270ms * 2 = 2540ms for communications round trip

At times they speak with no delay at all as shown in this video starting at 29:40

https://rumble.com/v4fb590-nasa-fraud.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

In most spots of the video, they wait 2-3 seconds to respond, but at certain spots they respond instantly

I guess it's impossible for the video to have been edited.

Everything is possible, that's why you have to check for yourself, or you can just have blind faith in the mainstream narrative.

That's a decision everyone has to make for themselves.