I don't really believe in miracles because we haven't seen anything of that sort ever happen. It'd be easy to fool the masses into believing Jesus was resurrected and many other things especially back then.
I'm skeptical and suspect the whole bible was not even a word or god. It's seems like it was a man made tool in order to contol the masses.
I don't think the creator would send his son and the whole 2nd half of the bible is extremely fear driven and that we must fear god.
Miracles are noncausal, so they can't be scientifically measured because of how noncausal works. It's kind of like a movie that's being written as-you-go, historical details get filled in to enable the miracle. We call it coincidence and ignore it, but it's really the power of the spirit of God within us that makes it happen.
The bible is not the word of God, that's quite a ridiculous claim. Anyone who has read it will note its written from the perspective of men. The claim is that it's inerrant and inspired. The inspired part isn't provable, the same way you can't measure a miracle.
God didn't "send his son" the way you describe it. It has to do with original sin, which is anger and judgement, being genetically woven into you through your father. They say your spirit comes from your father, but your mother will try to remake you in her image, which is of the spirit of Satan.
The new testament isn't fear driven at all. Again, you're interpreting it according to how you were told to read it, if you read it all. This is how the good news is poisoned. One recieves salvation through hearing, but one receives truth through holy Spirit, which is directly of the Father. Fear is hate. Hate is the opposite of love. The spirit of the Father is love, not emotional love, but pure emotionless and healing peace.
You are definitely not a mainstream Christian.
You seem to have your own religion and beliefs.
Hard to debate that since I haven't learnt your religion.
So are yours. Do you need me to take on the persona of someone who is deceived? Is your objective to disagree with me?
My objective is to help people question themselves.
Perhaps you should question what you have been told.
That's exactly what I did. After being surrounded by Christians most of my life, i started questioning their teachings and realized most of them don't even understand or have done any research on Judism or any other religion. They just go along with what is taught in mainstream Christian schools. They are pretty much brainwashed.
Once you start researching all sides of religions, you realize it's almost as everyone is brainwashed on both sides, fighting each other stating that their religion is the correct one and the other religion is wrong.
I'm not saying Christianity or Judism is the correct one. I do think Judism is much more logical then Christianity in many ways.
Define non-causal. It seems to me that the miracles in the bible both were caused by something and caused things. And after you explain what non-causal means, can you explain what it has to do with the type of science you seem to be admiring and advocating for? Is scientific measurability relevant when deciding whether to dismiss something?
