😂🤣 Okay, besides the fact that it’s complete bullshit what Greenpeace says, I wonder what they mean with „due to its outdated code“…

First, I would like to see a full report by Greenpeace exactly what parts of the code they find enery-inefficient. For each of these part I would like to see a refinement proposal with several pros and cons (yes, Greenpeace, this is what’s called a constructive scientific approach 🙃).

Second, AFAIK, nobody prevents you from downloading the code, changing it (if you know how), setting up a full node and imposing your own consensus rules. Oh wait… consensus is achieved in a decentralized way by a majority vote? 😱🫢 Crap, didn’t mean to scary you off… I forgot that the green religion doesn’t imply any notion of democracy.

#[0]