So far, our experience with open source development be like,

Yo, did you check out my repo?

Nah.

Did you check out mine?

Nah.

What about Sam's did you check out Sam's?

Nah. But I could, if I wanted to, kwim?

Fr, tho.

Wanna have some more tea?

Yup.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'll show you mine if you show me yours.

But first, you have to look at ours.

No free lookings.

Okay I'll look first but I'll send sats.

πŸ˜‚

Even when I look, I'm just gonna do a quick peak and a skim-over. Ain't nobody got time for that.

Personal observations however: This used to be slightly different in late 1990s FLOSS community. At least with the advent of github, forking something huge or starting a new project from scratch on one's own (because why not) became much more attractive and common than collaboration and improvement of existing code. That's why now in virtually every field of software we have a plethora of half-baked stuff that just all too often lacks resources for maintenance, bugfixing, support.

Yeah, no teamwork.

Maybe we are less social than people in the 90s.

Or homeschoolers. Homeschoolers are very sociable, I've noticed.

The main problem (not to me but in general) is: improvement of existing code requires the ability to read. "The Chuckcha be not a reader, the Chuckcha be a writer" vibe is now stronger than ever.

Yeah, I'm actually backward, in that I've read way more code than I've written, and in more languages.

I sit down to write something myself and get writer's block. πŸ˜…

Aargh! How to define a method in language XYZ again?

I try to mentally translate everything to pseudocode.

Yes. Definitely so. Plus: Communication. Joining a project led by someone else means you don't have a say immediately, you have to earn trust and merits before that. And this is work, this requires engagement and commitment. Seems a lot of this world is too short-lived for that. But maybe I'm too bleak Herr.

I donβ€˜t experience this in the Ruby ecosystem. But probably because not that many people are writting Ruby.

Yes, that's a smaller group. People tend to engage more, when it's a smaller group.

That's why I've been trying to network more. Create a sort of frens-cluster, where we engage regularly with the same people.

Like a sort of loosely-bound project team. Meet up in person. Have some chitchat. Plan conferences and national barbeques.

We need to form more Nostr-groups and we don't have to be Bitcoin millionaires to do it. We just need to be more local.

Another thing is that Nostr is a protocol, not a programming language, so we're often writing things other people can barely read.