What will you if it is not the left who killed this man?
It is a psyop..huge and worldwide.
Those things in nature are not left or right. That is a huge oversimplification in my opinion.
Discussion
I would admit I was wrong and issue a correction and reconsider my media sources.
I’m not wrong however. This was a leftist terror attack and likely had more plotters than just the shooter. Those details are trickling out as we speak.
Let’s see how it ages..but I'm a bit surprised that in such a deeply political and global situation you choose to double down on your statement and say : IT WAS THE LEFT.
I wonder what people said right after Kennedy was assassinated.
Of course in Kirk's case the system will do all it can to make it look like it was the left. At least that's how the script was written.
even if it wasn’t, what do you make of all the leftists celebrating his death? even if they didn’t pull the trigger, their ideas killed him
He had more enemies if you judge the situation upon what he was saying...it could as well be Hamas...sorry forgot that pro-Palestine movements are also labeled as "Left".
Honestly I think the Left's reaction is vastly amplified and potentially botted to oblivion to trigger rage worldwide and reach the psyop's objective.
I think it's the fiat system that ultimately killed him, not left or right.
The fiat machine needed a martyr to keep rolling..some blood to put the streets on fire.
One would think that's the first thought Bitcoiner would have and yet so many on bitcoin side are still triggered by left vs right narrative.
Doesn’t matter if it was or wasn’t. Those who are celebrating it are on the left. They wish it were them.
Stupid, irresponsible take. How many of those people could have posted those reactions in trauma, anger, fury or other emotional turmoil?
Guess what-all have targets on their backs now.
A peaceful political moderate Republican was publicly executed and your response is that the people who threw gasoline on the fire and showed their complete lack of humanity may have a target on their backs? I’m sorry, but that is an absolutely wild take.