Replying to Avatar π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž

I don’t like u lol #[0]
41
nobody 2y ago

Me neither, it’s a breach of privacy.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

Fr fr it fucked up my whole dm experience

41
nobody 2y ago

Yeah ! I understand that, you feel exposed ! And the DMs do not fulfill their intent if the metadata is public !

72
nobody 2y ago

It's like when you tell a friend something that's not really a secret, but it pisses you off when they tell everyone anyways....

41
nobody 2y ago

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Avatar
sneagan 2y ago

It's good to make people aware what is and isn't private. Nostr isn't a privacy protocol so metadata leaks are to be expected.

41
nobody 2y ago

Yeah I wrote about that this morning

nostr:note14j7zuvhmghrk5d32766q39nr47xewz89ra9pzp7pd805kf3vx33q2pcg5f

Avatar
sneagan 2y ago

This is the difference between E2EE P2P systems and public broadcast systems. Spending a ton of time making DMs truly private on nostr is a waste of time. There are lots of projects working on that and they're far ahead of anything that's going to be added to nostr. Nostr should stick to replacing the public web. Other people will solve the private web.

41
nobody 2y ago

I respect that, it’s just that there is no web without basic privacy.

Avatar
sneagan 2y ago

I don't understand what you mean. It exists right now. You have no privacy on the web.