Avatar
utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 2y ago

Should we make event kids that line up with schema.org ?

For example, a kind that represents a recipe, and will more easily be indexed and parsed by search engines

https://schema.org/Recipe

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
tanel 2y ago

nostr:npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf you were talking to me about this like a week ago 👀

Avatar
tanel 2y ago

we wanted to apply this within the creation of nostrwiki.com

Avatar
SMS 2y ago

🤌🏻

Avatar
hodlbod 2y ago

Absolutely, and you can use nip 32 to apply the nomenclature

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/32.md

Avatar
utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 2y ago

👀👀

Avatar
fiatjaf 2y ago

Don't listen to this NIP-32 fanboy, he wants to throw you in a RDF abyss.

Avatar
ben 2y ago

semantic web is a shitcoin

Avatar
Matthieu 2y ago

This would be dope.

Avatar
fiatjaf 2y ago

Of course not, are you insane?

Avatar
fiatjaf 2y ago

Describe to me the mechanism by which search engines will index an event on Nostr.

Avatar
utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 2y ago

Google connects to relays then stores the note??

Avatar
fiatjaf 2y ago

And then they change their entire search interface to be a Nostr client instead of just having links to webpages?

I'll take it.

80
szarka 2y ago

Do there need to be kinds for each format? If the payload is XML or some other structured format (e.g. YAML, JSON, etc.), the relevant format could already be identified from the metadata included there, right?